The gel test: sensitivity and specificity
for unexpected antibodies to blood group antigens
W.J. Judd, E.A. Steiner, and P.C. Knafl
The recently FDA-licensed anti-IgG gel test for pretransfusion antibody
detection requires crossover validation before implementation. Six hundred
coded samples sent for routine pretransfusion tests were used to compare
GEL (ID-MTS, Ortho Diagnostic Systems Inc., Raritan, NJ) with Löw
and Messeter's low-ionic-strength saline (LISS). There were 456 GEL-LISS-,
97 GEL+LISS+, 45 GEL-LISS+, and 2 GEL+LISS- tests. The 144 positive tests
involved 157 antibodies; 67 of these (cold auto, anti-M, -Le, etc.) were
considered harmless with respect to transfusion management. GEL-LISS+ tests
included seven samples containing potentially significant antibodies (assumed
from specificity): anti-K(4), -Jka, -Fyb, and -S.
Two potentially significant antibodies (anti-C and -D) were GEL+LISS-.
Sensitivity and specificity for potentially significant antibodies were
92% and 96% for GEL, and 98% and 90% for LISS, respectively. The seven
GEL-LISS+ samples associated with potentially significant antibodies were
from six patients. Five of these antibodies, all detected in immune-suppressed
patients, reacted predominantly as agglutinins in LISS. None of these seven
antibodies were detected reliably by polyethylene glycol and LISS-additive
tube methods. In light of the immune status of the patients with GEL-LISS+
agglutinins with specificity normally considered potentially significant,
and because other valid methods did not detect these antibodies, their
clinical importance is questionable. Excluding these questionable antibodies,
GEL has the same sensitivity and better specificity than LISS. GEL is a
valid method for pretransfusion antibody detection. Immunohematology1997;13:132-135.
Back to Top